A cost analysis of robotic vs. video-assisted thoracic surgery: The impact of the learning curve and the COVID-19 pandemic.

Introduction: Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) is an alternative to video-assessed thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for the treatment of lung cancer but concern exists regarding the high associated costs. The COVID-19 pandemic added further financial pressure to healthcare systems. This study investigated the impact of the learning curve on the cost-effectiveness of RATS lung resection and the financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on a RATS program. Methods: Patients undergoing RATS lung resection between January 2017 and December 2020 were prospectively followed. A matched cohort of VATS cases were analyzed in parallel. The first 100 and most recent 100 RATS cases performed at our institution were compared to assess the learning curve. Cases performed before and after March 2020 were compared to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. A comprehensive cost analysis of multiple theatre and postoperative data points was performed using Stata statistics package (v14.2). Results: 365 RATS cases were included. Median cost per procedure was £7,167 and theatre cost accounted for 70%. Major contributing factors to overall cost were operative time and postoperative length of stay. Cost per case was £640 less after passing the learning curve (p < 0.001) largely due to reduced operative time. Comparison of a post-learning curve RATS subgroup matched to 101 VATS cases revealed no significant difference in theatre costs between the two techniques. Overall cost of RATS lung resections performed before and during the COVID-19 pandemic were not significantly different. However, theatre costs were significantly cheaper (£620/case; p < 0.001) and postoperative costs were significantly more expensive (£1,221/case; p = 0.018) during the pandemic. Discussion: Passing the learning curve is associated with a significant reduction in the theatre costs associated with RATS lung resection and is comparable with the cost of VATS. This study may underestimate the true cost benefit of passing the learning curve due to the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on theatre costs. The COVID-19 pandemic made RATS lung resection more expensive due to prolonged hospital stay and increased readmission rate. The present study offers some evidence that the initial increased costs associated with RATS lung resection may be gradually offset as a program progresses.

Complete Surgical Resection of a Giant Invasive Thymoma with Right Pneumonectomy and Graft Reconstruction of the Superior Vena Cava and Left Brachiocephalic Vein: A Case Report.

Background: Complete surgical resection represents one of the most important prognostic factors for thymomas. However, surgery is usually not considered when there is invasion of the pulmonary hilum and mediastinal veins because of technical considerations or potential perioperative morbidity and mortality. Case Presentation. We present the case of a 37-year-old woman with a giant thymoma infiltrating the superior vena cava, left brachiocephalic vein, and most of the right lung. Following 3 cycles of chemotherapy with minimal tumour response, she was hospitalised with COVID-19 and refused further systemic treatment. She subsequently underwent surgery after a thorough preoperative evaluation. Surgical resection of the tumour was performed with concomitant right pneumonectomy and reconstruction of the superior vena cava and left brachiocephalic vein using expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene grafts through a median sternotomy combined with a clamshell incision. Histopathological analysis of the resected specimens demonstrated a type B2, Masaoka-Koga stage IVa thymoma that was completely resected. Following an uneventful course, she was discharged home on the ninth postoperative day with anticoagulation therapy. She has remained free of disease or adverse events after a 12-month follow-up. Conclusions: Complete surgical resection of invasive thymomas with concomitant pneumonectomy and venous graft reconstruction is a feasible and safe procedure. Careful patient selection and adequate postoperative anticoagulation are crucial for successful clinical outcomes.

Diaphragmatic paralysis post COVID-19 treated with robot-assisted plication reinforced with acellular dermal matrix: a report of two cases.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to be a disease of global importance, with an increasing array of sequelae attributed to infection by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. One such complication that has been rarely documented thus far is diaphragmatic dysfunction. Here, we report the cases of 2 individuals who developed diaphragmatic paralysis post COVID-19, which failed to respond to conservative management. Both patients proceeded to undergo robot-assisted thoracoscopic plication of the diaphragm reinforced with a bovine acellular dermal matrix. In both cases, there was significant improvement in symptomatology, namely dyspnoea and fatigue. We conclude that robot-assisted diaphragmatic plication should be considered for the treatment of refractory diaphragmatic paralysis post COVID-19.

Salvage pulmonary resection in stages IIIb-IV lung cancer after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors case series and literature review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The role of salvage thoracic surgery in managing advanced-stage lung cancer following treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors is currently unclear. We present a series of nine patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who underwent pulmonary resection following treatment with pembrolizumab. METHODS: We performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of pulmonary resection undertaken following treatment with pembrolizumab for advanced-stage lung cancer. Nine patients met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: In six cases, surgery was indicated for persistent localized disease after treatment, and in three cases for nonresponsive synchronous/metachronous lung nodules while on treatment for stage IV lung cancer. Dense hilar fibrosis was present in all patients. Minimal access surgery was achieved in five cases (video-assisted n = 2, robotic-assisted n = 3). There was no in-hospital mortality. One patient died within 60 days from community-acquired COVID-19 pneumonitis. Seven patients remain free of disease between 5 and 22 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary resection is safe and technically feasible following treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Surgical challenges relate to postimmunotherapy fibrosis, but with increased experience and a robotic approach, minimal access surgery is achievable. Further prospective studies are required to assess the surgical impact on disease control and overall survival in this patient cohort.

Maintaining safe lung cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic in a global city.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 has challenged health service provision worldwide. This work evaluates safe surgical pathways and standard operating procedures implemented in the high volume, global city of London during the first wave of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We also assess the safety of minimally invasive surgery(MIS) for anatomical lung resection. METHODS: This multicentre cohort study was conducted across all London thoracic surgical units, covering a catchment area of approximately 14.8 Million. A Pan-London Collaborative was created for data sharing and dissemination of protocols. All patients undergoing anatomical lung resection 1st March-1st June 2020 were included. Primary outcomes were SARS-CoV-2 infection, access to minimally invasive surgery, post-operative complication, length of intensive care and hospital stay (LOS), and death during follow up. FINDINGS: 352 patients underwent anatomical lung resection with a median age of 69 (IQR: 35-86) years. Self-isolation and pre-operative screening were implemented following the UK national lockdown. Pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 swabs were performed in 63.1% and CT imaging in 54.8%. 61.7% of cases were performed minimally invasively (MIS), compared to 59.9% pre pandemic. Median LOS was 6 days with a 30-day survival of 98.3% (comparable to a median LOS of 6 days and 30-day survival of 98.4% pre-pandemic). Significant complications developed in 7.3% of patients (Clavien-Dindo Grade 3-4) and 12 there were re-admissions(3.4%). Seven patients(2.0%) were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection, two of whom died (28.5%). INTERPRETATION: SARS-CoV-2 infection significantly increases morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing elective anatomical pulmonary resection. However, surgery can be safely undertaken via open and MIS approaches at the peak of a viral pandemic if precautionary measures are implemented. High volume surgery should continue during further viral peaks to minimise health service burden and potential harm to cancer patients. FUNDING: This work did not receive funding.

Surgery for recurrent thymoma during the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative review.

Patients who have undergone surgical resection of thymoma may present later with recurrence of disease. This is most commonly in the pleural cavity. Surgery for recurrent thymoma has been shown to have a survival advantage. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a reduction in capacity for routine healthcare provision. We present the outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for recurrent thymoma during the COVID-19 pandemic and our protocols to allow surgery to be performed during this time. Retrospective review of patients undergoing surgery for recurrent thymoma between March 2020 and the March 2021 at a single centre was performed. Preoperative demographic data, postoperative outcomes and the incidence of complications or postoperative COVID-19 infection were assessed. Over a 4-year period, and under the care of a single surgeon, 7 operations were performed for recurrent thymoma. Of these, three patients were operated during the COVID-19 pandemic. All patients had a history of myasthenia gravis (MG) and all patients presented with disease recurrence in the pleural cavity. No patients had post-operative complications and no patients tested positive for COVID-19 in the pre or postoperative period. Complete macroscopic resection was achieved in all patients. Surgery for recurrent thymoma can be performed safely and complete macroscopic resection can be achieved. It is possible to offer surgery with low risk of perioperative COVID infection and related morbidity and mortality. Given the benefits seen in survival and disease-free survival, we believe surgery for recurrent thymoma should continue to be advocated even during the current viral pandemic.

Improving outcomes of surgery in advanced infiltrative thymic tumours: the benefits of multidisciplinary approach.

BACKGROUND: For stage III or IVa thymic tumours, a multimodality approach is recommended. The role of surgery is to achieve complete resection. AIM: To present the outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for stage III or IVa thymoma. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients undergoing open surgery for stage III or IVa thymoma between 2016 and 2020 at a single centre was performed. Preoperative imaging, treatment plan, surgical approach, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients underwent surgery for thymoma. Patients with clinical stage I/II thymoma or minimally invasive thymectomy were excluded. Thirteen patients with clinical stage III or IVa were included. Median sternotomy approach was used in four patients, of which one was redo sternotomy; a hemi-clamshell in four; and a combination of approaches in the remaining five patients. There was no postoperative mortality. Four patients had postoperative complications. Complete resection was achieved in all but two patients. At a median follow-up of 17.9 months, all patients were alive with no evidence of recurrence except one who died 4 months after surgery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for stage III and IVa thymoma is safe and can be achieved with complete macroscopic resection. To obtain adequate exposure of all structures involved in the tumour, combined surgical approaches can be used with no increased morbidity. The majority of patients, even after extrapleural pneumonectomy, did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy and had no evidence of local relapse.

Simulation and Measurement of Aerosolisation in Different Chest Drainage Systems.

The aim of the study was to assess the degree of aerosolisation in different chest drainage systems according to different air leak volumes, in a simulated environment. This novel simulation model was designed to produce an air leak by passing air through and agitating a fluorescent fluid. The air leak volume and amount of fluorescent fluid were tested in various combinations and aerosolisation was assessed at 10-minute intervals using the ultraviolet light. The following chest drainage systems were compared: (1) single-chamber chest drainage system, (2) 3-compartment wet-dry suction chest drainage system, (3) digital drainage and monitoring system. The impact of suction (-2 and -4 kPa) in generating aerosolised particles was tested as well. A total number of 187 of 10-minute interval measurements were performed. The single-chamber chest drainage system generated the largest number of aerosolised particles at different air leak volumes and drainage output. The 3-compartment wet-dry suction system and the digital drainage and monitoring system did not generate any identifiable aerosolised particles at any of the air leak or drain output volumes considered. Suction applied to the chest drainage systems did not have an effect on aerosolisation. Aerosol generation in the simulated air-leak model demonstrated the potential risk of SARS-CoV-2 spread in the clinical setting. Full personal protective equipment must be used in patients with an air leak. Single-chamber chest drainage system generates the highest rate of aerosolised particles and it should not be used as an open system in patients with an air leak.

Elective lung cancer surgery in the COVID-19 era: how do we do it?

The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused significant mortality around the world and the focus has been on reducing the number of infections. In order not to compromise treatment of oncology patients, reducing the number of patients with COVID-19 undergoing treatment is mandatory. We reviewed the experience of the National Institute of Cancer in Milan and compared it with our experience.